Featured Matches
Previous
AEL
Tottenham Hotspur
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
KSC Lokeren
Hull City
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Real Sociedad
Krasnodar
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Lyon
FK Astra Giurgiu
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
PSV Eindhoven
Shakhter Soligorsk
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Astana 1964
Villarreal
0
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FK Sarajevo
Borussia Monchengladbach
2
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Astana 1964
Villarreal
0
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Aktobe Lento
Legia Warsaw
0
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Dinamo Moscow
Omonia Nicosia
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Ruch Chorzow
Metalist Kharkiv
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
HJK Helsinki
Rapid Vienna
2
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FK Qarabag
Twente Enschede
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
AEL
Tottenham Hotspur
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
PSV Eindhoven
Shakhter Soligorsk
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Karabükspor
St Etienne
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Elfsborg
Rio Ave
2
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Dinamo Minsk
CD Nacional de Madeira
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Petrolul Ploiesti
Dinamo Zagreb
1
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
BSC Young Boys
Debrecen
3
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Apollon Limassol
Lokomotiv Moscow
1
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FC Zorya Luhansk
Feyenoord Rotterdam
1
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Trabzonspor
Rostov
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Panathinaikos
FC Midtjylland
4
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
PEC Zwolle
Sparta Prague
1
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Zimbru Chisinau
PAOK Salonika
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FC Spartak Trnava
FC Zürich
1
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FK Partizan Belgrade
Neftchi Baku PFC
3
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Grasshoppers Zürich
Club Brugge
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Asteras Tripolis
Maccabi Tel-Aviv
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Real Sociedad
Krasnodar
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
RNK Split
Torino
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Lyon
FK Astra Giurgiu
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
KSC Lokeren
Hull City
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FK Sarajevo
Borussia Monchengladbach
2
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Rijeka
Sheriff Tiraspol
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Sassuolo
Cittadella
4
1
FT
Game Details
Real Espana
Municipal
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Belmopan Bandits
Metapan
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Inti Gas Deportes
Caracas F.C.
0
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Deportivo Capiatá
Danubio F.C.
3
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Barcelona
Alianza Lima
1
0
LIVE 45' +1'
Leg 1
Game Details
Trujillanos
Independiente del Valle
0
0
LIVE HT
Leg 1
Game Details
Millonarios
César Vallejo
12:50 AM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Universidad Católica
River Plate
12:50 AM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Corinthians
Goiás EC
1
1
LIVE HT
Game Details
Cruzeiro
Gremio
ESPN3 11:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Next

Barca hampered by archaic FIFA

Barcelona 15 hours ago
Read
Bayern MunichBayern Munich
VfL WolfsburgVfL Wolfsburg
6:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Nov 24, 2010

World Cup going Dutch?

I have a pitch for you. A global TV show called Do you wanna host the World Cup?, in which candidate countries present themselves and their bids. The millions, maybe billions, of viewers all over the world can vote them off, one by one, by internet or SMS. I could make a fortune from the show, generate sensational hype for weeks and in the process add some much-needed transparency to the procedure. FIFA have definitely missed a trick.

The current system is an invitation for rigging, wheeler-dealing, manipulation, conspiracies and, allegedly, bribes. That is the likely result when there is a multi-billion project up for grabs - it is a natural instinct. It is definitely not fair, but it is the way we are, some more than others, and if you are looking for a large collection of these more unscrupulous people, then you don't have look any further than the football world and its hugely competitive, money-ruled, easily accessible and no-questions-asked society.

There are people who are deeply concerned about corruption in and around FIFA, but in my opinion it could have been much, much worse. Having seen the kind of the folks that try to grab a share of the billions of dollars floating around in our beloved sport, I am surprised any standard of ethics can be reached at all. We should not therefore fool ourselves that the bids for the World Cups in 2018 and 2022 can ever be fair or ethical. Think again. Let's hope these contenders just don't go too far. Enjoy your sausage, but never look inside.

Over the last year, snippets of accusations about the bidding countries have surfaced in the newspapers and don't need to be repeated here. The Netherlands/Belgium (N/B) bid has, for the moment, managed to stay clear of any mud raking. Maybe it is considered an also-ran by the others and is overlooked in the smear campaigns, but this cleanness has now become a selling point. Over the last month, director Harry Been has, almost triumphantly, tried to spin the campaign into being the No. 1 in terms of morality.

Of all the participants, Netherlands as a nation can claim a superior seventh place in Transparency International's annual Corruption Perception Index, with most European rivals placed between 20 and 32, including partner Belgium, and Russia as a distant number 154. This gives the Russians an edge, however, when it comes to organising the World Cup. Don't expect them to deliberate whether the needed infrastructure really is environmentally friendly or if the eight-hour day for the construction labourers is being safeguarded. Whatever happens, Russia can guarantee that work will be finished way before the World Cup starts. Money is not a problem either, which is very unlike the situation in the Netherlands.

Furthermore, FIFA's evaluation report states: "If Holland & Belgium are awarded the hosting rights, FIFA's legal risk appears to be medium. Whilst the requirements for contractual documents have been largely met, the necessary government support has not been secured as neither the government guarantees nor the government declaration have been provided in compliance with FIFA's requirements for government documents." All the European rivals have a low legal risk.

Doubts especially exist over the VAT exemption that FIFA demands. The N/B bid had fixed a solution to fool the watchful European Union watchdogs, but in both parliaments members have voiced their disapproval. In fact, the Russians have an advantage as they don't have to comply to any EU rules.

A second setback was a report about the economic effects of the World Cup in the Netherlands. An independent research bureau produced estimates ranging between a worst-case loss of €1 billion to a best-case profit of €400 million. This profound investigation was cast aside by the second opinion of the N/B bid, who let some 'football experts' pump up the numbers to expect a whopping €1 billion profit. That went nicely with another magic figure, an extra tax income of €1.2 billion for Germany thanks to the World Cup in 2006, which was trumpeted through the Dutch media.

The source of the teutonic windfall has remained a mystery as such a figure is all but impossible to account for. None of the official German reports made mention of this number. It may have had something to do with the government investing several billion in new stadia. 'A cigar from your own box' is what we say in the Netherlands.

Doubts have also arisen over the renovation of the Dutch venues. Local and national governments signed a letter of intent to accomodate grounds in Enschede, Heerenveen, Amsterdam and Rotterdam that matched World Cup standards with at least a 45,000 capacity. Later, a dispute emerged over who actually had to pay for this. No one knows.

A great selling point in the N/B bid is to be the 'Greenest World Cup'. With small distances between host cities and the use of sustainable energy the ecological footprint of the tournament will be as low as possible. The expected two million foreign fans will all have a bicycle at their disposal. Come again? Two million free bikes? An neat idea, but not very realistic. Where are these bikes coming from when the industry only produces one million a year at the best of times, and where will they go once the tournament is over?

When it comes to influencing the FIFA Executive Committee the N/B bid has only opened several 'Cruyff Courts' - small playing grounds with artificial turf - in some foreign cities while playing friendly games with former star players on the doorstep of the Executive Committee members. One vote is theirs already as Belgium's Michel d'Hooghe backed the bid from day one. Understandable, but on the other hand even in the Eurovision Song Contest the juries cannot vote on their own act. D'Hooghe endorsed the bid even before one single letter was written in the bid book.

Last week, the new Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte called FIFA president Sepp Blatter to emphasise the enthusiasm of the Dutch government for the bid, as this was doubted in FIFA's evaluation report. Rutte also pointed out the cleanliness of the campaign and continued by ensuring N/B backing if Blatter would ever run for secretary general of the United Nations.

I made up the last bit, but you never know. World Cup bidding is a free for all, which is not restricted to the transfer of money. It is a murky world in which all participants will have dirty hands at some point, but there it is. You can't eat an omelette without breaking eggs.

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.