Previous
AS Roma
CSKA Moscow
5
1
FT
Game Details
Bayern Munich
Manchester City
1
0
FT
Game Details
Ajax Amsterdam
Paris Saint-Germain
1
1
FT
Game Details
Barcelona
Apoel Nicosia
1
0
FT
Game Details
Chelsea
Schalke 04
1
1
FT
Game Details
NK Maribor
Sporting Lisbon
1
1
FT
Game Details
Athletic Bilbao
Shakhtar Donetsk
0
0
FT
Game Details
FC Porto
BATE Borisov
6
0
FT
Game Details
Blackburn Rovers
Derby County
2
3
FT
Game Details
Nottingham Forest
Fulham
5
3
FT
Game Details
Fleetwood Town
Barnsley
0
0
FT
Game Details
FC Magna Wr. Neustadt
Rapid Vienna
1
5
FT
Game Details
SV Grodig
SC Rheindorf Altach
3
3
FT
Game Details
Montreal Impact
New York Red Bulls
1
0
FT
Game Details
Bayamon FC
America
1
10
FT
Game Details
Municipal
Real Espana
1
0
LIVE 37'
Game Details
Huachipato
U. Católica
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Universitario de Sucre
César Vallejo
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Libertad
Barcelona
2
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 2 - 1
Game Details
River Plate
Godoy Cruz de Mendoza
2
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 3 - 0
Game Details
San Lorenzo
Defensa y Justicia
1
2
FT
Game Details
Nueva Chicago
Boca Unidos
0
0
FT
Game Details
Huracán
Crucero del Norte
0
2
FT
Game Details
Aldosivi
Douglas Haig
1
1
FT
Game Details
Guarini A. Franco
Ferro Carril Oeste
1
1
FT
Game Details
Patronato
Atlético Tucumán
1
1
FT
Game Details
Sarmiento de Junín
Santamarina
2
2
FT
Game Details
Gimnasia y Esgrima de Jujuy
Instituto de Córdoba
1
2
FT
Game Details
Independiente Rivadavia
All Boys
0
0
FT
Game Details
At. San Luis
Correcaminos
4
0
FT
Game Details
Irapuato
Altamira
0
1
FT
Game Details
Oaxaca
Lobos BUAP
1
1
FT
Game Details
Chiapas
Veracruz
1
2
LIVE 28'
Game Details
Queretaro
U.A.N.L
0
1
LIVE 14'
Game Details
U. de G.
Atlas
1
1
LIVE 16'
Game Details
Cruzeiro
Atletico Paranaense
2
0
FT
Game Details
EC Vitória
Fluminense FC
3
1
FT
Game Details
Figueirense FC
Criciúma
1
1
FT
Game Details
Sport
Internacional
0
0
FT
Game Details
Botafogo
Bahia
2
2
LIVE 84'
Game Details
Coritiba FBC
São Paulo
2
1
LIVE 85'
Game Details
Palmeiras
Flamengo
2
2
LIVE 81'
Game Details
Alianza Lima
Inti Gas Deportes
2
1
FT
Game Details
12 de Octubre
Nacional
1
1
FT
Game Details
FC Seoul
Western Sydney Wanderers
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Bay United
Mamelodi Sundowns
Postp
Game Details
Chippa United
Orlando Pirates
Postp
Game Details
Free State Stars
Moroka Swallows
Postp
Game Details
Mpumalanga Black Aces
Ajax Cape Town
Postp
Game Details
Silver Stars
Pretoria Univ
Postp
Game Details
SuperSport United
Bloem Celtic
Postp
Game Details
Alajuelense
Belen
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Patriotas F.C.
La Equidad
(4) 2
(3) 2
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 2 - 2
Game Details
Atlético Junior
Llaneros
(4) 1
(2) 1
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 1 - 1
Game Details
Boyacá Chicó FC
Once Caldas
0
1
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 1 - 3
Game Details
Deportes Tolima
Independiente Medellín
12:30 AM GMT
Leg 2Aggregate: 1 - 0
Game Details
Independiente Santa Fe
Cucuta
2
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 4 - 1
Game Details
Next

Danny Welbeck will be worth the wait

Arsenal 15 hours ago
Read

Danny Welbeck will be worth the wait

Arsenal 15 hours ago
Read

Media slam Arsenal 'soft centre'

Arsenal 19 hours ago
Read
Feb 16, 2006

The evil genius of Real Madrid

How are the mighty fallen. Having sat proudly atop the Money League for nine years Manchester United have finally been usurped by Real Madrid. Who else?

Accountancy group Deloitte's annual look at the money-making power of the world's football clubs has revealed a perverse truth: Real are now the standard bearers for all things financial in football thanks to a strategy which has actually stymied on-field success.

While signing Galacticos wins elections for presidential candidates, sells shirts and tickets in their millions and encourages broadcasters to put their money where their mouths are, it doesn't guarantee victory in football matches.

In the three years since Real Madrid bought one-man commercial phenomenon David Beckham they have won nothing of note; no major titles and no meaningful trophies. Despite this the club now garner more income than any other in the world by virtue of their superior business activities.

Until now conventional wisdom had it that success breeds success; which in turn, at the risk of getting a touch philosophical, breeds success. United have dominated Deloitte's Money League since its first edition nine years ago because they won the most titles and cups; as a result they got rich, and as a result they became stronger as team and won even more and got richer still.

The reason United are now slipping down the financial league table is because they find themselves slipping down the actual league table. The strength of the team directly affects the club's financial performance.

Or does it? It can't all be the fault of Eric Djemba-Djemba and Diego Forlan.

If that's the case why are Real Madrid top of the financial pops? They haven't won the King's Cup since 1992/93, the Champions League since 2001/02 or La Liga since 2002/03. So why are they sitting pretty three years since their last major triumph?

Well, flying in the face of that conventional wisdom is a stupendously successful and aggressive marketing campaign that has positioned Real as the best club in the world, without actually being the best club in the world. Clever isn't it?

Real Madrid's commercial team have managed to convince the easily led that they are the best because of perceived stature. The Real Madrid brand states that class is permanent, form is temporary: 'We've won 9 European Cups, so we're the best. Thanks for coming, buy a shirt.'

That said, in part the Galacticos principle is based on the 'success breeds success' theory i.e. sign the best players and you get the best team, win titles and trophies, win new fans, earn more money, buy more players and so on, ad infinitum. It's just that the Real Madrid model is skewed in favour of flair - attack not defence - thus making it hugely flawed from a football perspective. Real's old 'Pavons and Zidanes' policy, buying amazing forwards to score the goals and sell the t-shirts while hoping that home grown defenders can stem the flow of goals at the back, doesn't work.

The perverse paradox of the policy, its evil genius, is that it doesn't have to work on the pitch to work off it.

Win or lose Beckham, Ronaldo, Zidane and Raul are packaged and airbrushed to the point that they are mythical sporting superstars despite the tarnish of sporting failure.

In the Money League the difference between first place Real Madrid and second place Manchester United is £20million. The Spanish club made £186.2million in 2004/05 while United made £166.4million.

Interestingly, under the terms of Beckham's deal with Real Madrid half his income from personal sponsorship deals go to the club. Last season the England skipper signed a deal to become the worldwide face of Gillette in deal thought to be worth in the region of £40million. The missing £20milion?

Enough of Real Madrid. What of Chelsea and that nice Abramovich chap? Well, Deloitte's Money League doesn't take into account the wherewithal of club owners or benefactors, it takes account only of income. It doesn't look at costs either. It is easy to get confused. This list is about how much money comes in, not what's left after the bills are paid. Profit and loss is another list.

So, what of the future? Does Real Madrid's overtaking of United mark a sea change, a dramatic and lasting transfer in the balance of power? Did Malcolm Glazer and sons get their timing wrong when they assumed control of United? Not according to the number crunchers at Deloitte, who see challenges ahead for Real.

Firstly the good news for the Glazers is that increasing Old Trafford to in excess of 70,000 seats will boost match-day income, and despite underachievement of late the club retain a global presence. In business vernacular they are 'well positioned'.

Furthermore, Juventus and AC Milan have recently brokered hugely lucrative television deals, and as Chelsea's on-pitch success continues so their international profile grows and therefore so does their commercial money-making ability.

Do you remember when football was a game not just a financial proposition. That's progress for you.


  • Any thoughts? Then you can email Phil Holland.