Previous
France
Croatia
4
2
FT
Match 64
Game Details
Belgium
England
2
0
FT
Match 63
Game Details
Next

Man United agree deal for Blind to rejoin Ajax

Transfers
Read

Ronaldo: It was 'easy to decide' to join Juventus

Transfers
Read

James won't make early Madrid return - agency

Transfers
Read

Hazard, Chelsea may be ready for split - Martinez

Transfers
Read

Transfer Rater: Milinkovic-Savic to Chelsea

Football Whispers
Read

Man Utd's Shaw will leave if not starting - sources

Manchester United
Read

Courtois: I'm worth more than Chelsea offer now

Chelsea
Read

Sources: Villa battling Derby, Stoke for Wilson

Transfers
Read
 By PA Sport

Swansea criticise Utrecht over comments on Michel Vorm transfer

Michel Vorm left Swansea for Tottenham in 2014.

Swansea have criticised Dutch club Utrecht over comments they made in relation to the ongoing Michel Vorm transfer case.

Vorm's 2014 transfer to Tottenam was the subject of a Court of Arbitration for Sport hearing at the end of January, following a complaint from Utrecht.

The 32-year-old goalkeeper's former club claim they are owed a sell-on fee for a player they sold to Swansea for £1.5 million in 2011. He went on to make 97 appearances for the Welsh club.

Netherlands international Vorm left Swansea for Spurs on the same day as defender Ben Davies, with forward Gylfi Sigurdsson going the other way, and Utrecht questioned why the goalkeeper, with two years left on his contract, was given a zero value in the transactions.

Utrecht director Wilco van Schaik, quoted by Dutch TV station RTV Utrecht last weekend, said CAS had "proven them right on some points" but that "overall they had been defeated."

However, there has been no official statement from the Lausanne-based court and Swansea issued a terse statement concerning the case on Tuesday.

"Swansea has seen the comments made on behalf of Utrecht and was extremely surprised and disappointed at both their timing and inaccuracy," read the statement on the club's official website.

"We wish to make it clear that both clubs have been instructed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport to refrain from comment pending publication of the full decision by the court and we have fully respected this.

"Immediately as that occurs the club will make a clear and full comment."

The Dutch Eredivisie outfit have previously had their case dismissed by world football's governing body FIFA.

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.