Previous
Burton Albion
Liverpool
0
5
FT
Game Details
Chelsea
Bristol Rovers
3
2
FT
Game Details
Everton
Yeovil Town
4
0
FT
Game Details
AS Roma
FC Porto
0
3
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 1 - 4
Game Details
AS Monaco
Villarreal
1
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 3 - 1
Game Details
Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Celtic
2
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 4 - 5
Game Details
Vancouver Whitecaps
Sporting Kansas City
3
0
FT
Game Details
Next

When is the Europa League draw?

Europa League
Read

When is the Champions League draw?

Champions League
Read

EFL Cup third round draw

EFL Cup
Read

UEFA stands by Financial Fair Play

UEFA has insisted its Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations have been introduced to make the game more sustainable and not to force financial equality after a top lawyer questioned its legality.

Jean-Louis Dupont, one of the leading football lawyers and part of the legal team which represented Jean-Marc Bosman in 1995 which resulted in players being able to leave clubs as free agents at the end of their contracts, believes FFP could be in tatters if it is challenged in the courts.

The European Commission has approved FFP, but there is still the possibility that European competition laws could be used to invalidate the new regulations.

A UEFA spokesman said: "UEFA is aware, that there are large differences between the comparative wealth of different clubs and countries, but financial fair play does not have financial equality as its objective.

"However, more investors should be attracted if club football is more sustainable and those clubs with sustainable and stable business models will be in a position to become more competitive.''

Dupont, writing a column in the Wall Street Journal, had said: "Some of Europe's biggest clubs are, unsurprisingly, the loudest supporters of rules that entrench their dominance. The time is right for a strong reminder from the EU's anti-trust authorities that football, like any other multibillion-euro industry, must comply with the law.

"As an agreement whereby industry participants jointly decide to limit investments, FFP likely constitutes collusion and hence a violation of EU competition law. FFP may also infringe other EU freedoms such as the free movement of workers and services.

"Even if FFP were sufficiently legitimate and necessary to justify its distortions of EU principles, however, it would still have to clear a final hurdle: proportionality. UEFA would need to convince the EU's judges in Luxembourg that FFP is the least restrictive means of achieving its aims. This seems unlikely.''

Information from the Press Association was used in this report

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.