Previous
Juventus
Malmo FF
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Olympiakos
Atletico Madrid
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Liverpool
Ludogorets Razgrad
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Real Madrid
FC Basel
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
AS Monaco
Bayer Leverkusen
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Benfica
Zenit St Petersburg
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Borussia Dortmund
Arsenal
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Galatasaray
Anderlecht
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
AFC Bournemouth
Leeds United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Birmingham City
Sheffield Wednesday
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Blackpool
Watford
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Brentford
Norwich City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Cardiff City
Middlesbrough
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Charlton Athletic
Wolverhampton Wanderers
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Huddersfield Town
Wigan Athletic
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Ipswich Town
Brighton & Hove Albion
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Bolton Wanderers
Rotherham United
7:00 PM GMT
Game Details
Reading
Millwall
7:00 PM GMT
Game Details
Colchester United
Sheffield United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Doncaster Rovers
Crawley Town
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Gillingham
Peterborough United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Milton Keynes Dons
Bradford City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Notts County
Leyton Orient
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Port Vale
Bristol City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Preston North End
Chesterfield
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Rochdale
Walsall
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Scunthorpe United
Coventry City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Swindon Town
Oldham Athletic
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Yeovil Town
Crewe Alexandra
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
AFC Wimbledon
Burton Albion
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Bury
Stevenage
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Cambridge United
Exeter City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Cheltenham Town
Southend United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Mansfield Town
Morecambe
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Northampton Town
Hartlepool United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Oxford United
Accrington Stanley
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Plymouth Argyle
Wycombe Wanderers
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Portsmouth
Dagenham & Redbridge
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Shrewsbury Town
Carlisle United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Tranmere Rovers
Newport County
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
York City
Luton Town
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Aldershot Town
Braintree Town
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Alfreton Town
AFC Telford United
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Bristol Rovers
Nuneaton Town
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Chester City
Southport
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Dartford
Dover
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Eastleigh
Forest Green Rovers
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Halifax
Grimsby Town
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Kidderminster Harriers
Altrincham
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Macclesfield Town
Gateshead
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Torquay United
Woking
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Welling
Lincoln City
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Barnet
Wrexham
7:00 PM GMT
Game Details
Rangers
Inverness Caledonian Thistle
6:45 PM GMT
Game Details
Waterhouse
DC United
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Cruz Azul
Chorrillo FC
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Portland Timbers
Olimpia
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Estudiantes La Plata
Gimnasia La Plata
10:00 PM GMT
Leg 2Aggregate: 0 - 0
Game Details
Independiente del Valle
Cerro Porteño
10:00 PM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Deportivo Capiatá
Caracas F.C.
12:15 AM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Peñarol
Deportivo Cali
12:30 AM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Guadalajara
Tijuana
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Mérida
Atlante
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Puebla
Morelia
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Celaya
Necaxa
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Coras Tepic
Zacatepec
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Dorados de Sinaloa
Mineros de Zacatecas
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Monterrey
Santos
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Toluca
UNAM
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
América Mineiro
Bragantino
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Avaí
Sampaio Correa-MA
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Goianiense
América RN
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Náutico
Joinville
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Paraná Clube
Ceará
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
Portuguesa de Desportos
Boa MG
10:30 PM GMT
Game Details
ABC
AA Ponte Preta
12:50 AM GMT
Game Details
Icasa
Vila Nova-GO
12:50 AM GMT
Game Details
Luverdense
Santa Cruz FC
12:50 AM GMT
Game Details
Oeste
CR Vasco da Gama
12:50 AM GMT
Game Details
Al Hilal
Al-Ain
5:30 PM GMT
Leg 1
Game Details
Bidvest Wits
Amazulu
Postp
Game Details
Kaizer Chiefs
Maritzburg Utd
Postp
Game Details
Next

Duarte: Dunga's return is complicated

Brazil Jul 21, 2014
Read
 Posted by Nick Ames
Jul 15, 2014

Rating the World Cup's innovations

FC's Craig Burley and Shaka Hislop wonder if there were more deserving players to win the Golden Ball than Argentina's Lionel Messi.

We have a new world champion, but that's not all. The footballing legacy of World Cup 2014 is undoubted, but some of the on- and off-pitch innovations we saw during the month might just stand the test of time, too. Here, we review and rate the five most eye-catching additions to the tournament ...

Innovation: Vanishing Foam

There was something vaguely pleasing about seeing footballers stand to order while a schoolteacher-like referee walked along the defensive wall and, in something visibly similar to shaving foam, marked out their limits. Sometimes it was curved neatly around where the ball should be kicked from, too. The mere sight of the can seemed deterrent enough: instances of encroachments were few, although they'll never be eradicated completely; a simple visual cue was seemingly enough for the vast majority of World Cup participants to shape up and shut up.

The spray's cult was cast in stone when it inspired a Google "doodle" on July 8. It wasn't entirely consistent: some of its lines were straighter and more pleasing to the eye than others; once or twice it flecked onto a player's perfectly-tanned boot; sometimes it bubbled up to the extent that you feared being transported to a foam party at a nightclub. By and large, though, it did its job -- and inventor Heine Allemagne now looks likely to become a very rich man indeed.

The vanishing foam seemed to do a good job of keeping players at bay.
The vanishing foam seemed to do a good job of keeping players at bay.

Not that it was omnipotent: despite its best efforts to cut out the time-wasting and stagey commotion that uniformly accompanies set pieces, ball-in-play figures were not really improved. It also didn't do much to assist the generally poor quality of players' long-range shooting despite offering them greater space in which to set their sights. But the thought was there and that, surely, counts for something.

Verdict: Hit! It still looks and feels a bit strange, and its novelty-comedy value might not expire for a while, but the level of compliance it inspired was impressive.

Innovation: The Brazuca

This was, from the outset, a ball with a difference. This was a ball developed to within an inch of its life in order to thrive in the unique climate in which it would be operating during Brazil 2014. This was a ball whose green and gold swirls spoke to millions worldwide. This was a ball with a Twitter account.

You almost hoped that the Brazuca would receive more criticism than it did simply to see whether its relentlessly upbeat, cheeky social media personal might crack a little. It's certainly hard to imagine the embattled Jabulani of 2010 getting away with calling itself a "World Cup legend" or summoning the sangfroid to tweet "Squeaky valve time" as the final neared its climax. But having breezed onto the scene full of gusto with its first-ever proclamation back on Dec. 3, the ball justified its self-confidence.

The Brazuca proved to be a worthy match ball in Brazil, a far cry from the disastrous Jabulani of 2010.
The Brazuca proved to be a worthy match ball in Brazil, a far cry from the disastrous Jabulani of 2010.

FIFA had been keen to make it known that the ball's design, with fewer panels among less-translatable tweaks, was intended to remove the unpredictability seen in South Africa, and so it -- largely -- proved. Igor Akinfeev's calamitous fielding of long-range shots in Russia's first match against South Korea might have placed the spotlight firmly on the ball in other years, but his was simply an individual disintegration.

The overall quality of efforts from distance was, particularly in the group stages, poor -- but again, the Brazuca received far less scrutiny than the footballers' technical shortcomings. And quite rightly: this was, by recent standards, a ball that stayed hit; a ball that didn't use the slightest excuse to wobble as soon as it met the laces; a ball that could reasonably say it had contributed positively to James Rodriguez's and David Luiz's wonder-goals, to name but two. Its 645 tweets confirm that, like the Jabulani, it had a life of its own -- but in an entirely different sense of the phrase.

Verdict: Hit! But this trend for talking balls can't be allowed to continue ...

Innovation: Goal-line Technology

It all seemed a bit much at first -- like a prodigious new kid at school who's just too keen to impress. Replays "proving" that the ball had crossed the line were an unfathomable feature of the World Cup's early games, although there is a small, dorky satisfaction in seeing goals rendered by computer matrices. Once television editors realised that this cut little ice, the way was clear for goal-line technology to be ... well ... barely relevant to the tournament.

The only real moment of excitement came in France's win over Honduras, when the hawk-eye technology accurately ruled that goalkeeper Noel Valladares had scored an own goal to put the French up 2-0. A subsequent on-screen replay that showed the sequence of events in stages, beginning with the ball hitting the post and flashing "No Goal," caused some mild consternation and revived memories of Argentina's win over Mexico in 2010, when stadium screens showed clearly that a Carlos Tevez goal should have been ruled out just as the game was about to restart. But that was all cleared up quickly enough and, as you would ordinarily expect, further occasions for controversy were limited.

Goal-line technology caused little issue; Honduras' Noel Valladares was rightly charged with an own goal.
Goal-line technology caused little issue; Honduras' Noel Valladares was rightly charged with an own goal.

Bar a minor flutter of interest in the fate of Ron Vlaar's missed penalty in the semi-final shoot-out (there was, briefly, a school of thought that it had spun back and crossed the line), there were few further calls for the goal-line radar to determine anything.

Verdict: Hit and miss. It clearly works and plainly won't be needed all that often -- but work needs to be done on its presentation.

Innovation: Drink breaks

This World Cup was always going to be exhausting, and FIFA had ruled that three-minute time-outs could be granted in the 30th and 75th minutes of games played in temperatures of over 32 degrees Celsius (89.6 degrees Fahrenheit). The first such pause arrived during the first half of the 2-2 draw between the U.S. and Portugal in the group stage, given at the referee's discretion in the famously humid environs of Manaus (66 percent on the night), although it lasted less than a minute.

The real interest came during the Netherlands' round of 16 win over Mexico. Played at what was sometimes walking pace in Fortaleza -- the conditions were such that supporters virtually emptied the areas of the stadium that lay in direct sunlight -- this was the first match to see the three-minute breaks implemented. Did it do more than rehydrate the players?

"It was during the cooling break that I started with the plan B," beamed Louis van Gaal afterward as his shape-shifting of the Dutch side eventually bore fruit with a late comeback. Van Gaal went on to explain that he had planned in advance to use the cooling breaks to disseminate his tactical changes, the second of which saw him throw on Klaas-Jan Huntelaar and opt for a more direct approach.

Cooling breaks probably weren't used enough for players though the Dutch famously profited vs. Mexico.
Cooling breaks probably weren't used enough for players though the Dutch famously profited vs. Mexico.

It was laudable forward thinking, although Van Gaal was keen to play up his wizardry throughout the tournament and would doubtless have found a way to get his message across in any case. How important the three minutes themselves were tactically is difficult to know, but coaches would doubtless welcome similar windows after this.

On the debit side, there is surely an argument that they were not used enough. The early skirmishes in Manaus were a case in point: when Italy's Claudio Marchisio complained of "hallucinations" after the win over England, something can't have been right. And the wilting of several sides as games went on -- Croatia a notable example during their 3-1 defeat to Mexico -- suggested the conditions had taken their toll.

Verdict: Hit and miss. Good for players and, seemingly, for coaches -- but they should have been adopted more regularly.

Innovation: The Golden Ball Vote

Votes for the World Cup's best player used to be cast by those members of the media who had spent a month racking up the air miles. They would receive a shortlist drawn up by FIFA's technical committee and pick their favourite. Previous winners such as Diego Forlan and Oliver Kahn caused little rancour -- although the timing of 2006 winner Zinedine Zidane's late disgrace in the final was certainly unfortunate -- and the system seemed a sound one.

This time around, the journalists' views were dispensed with and the technical committee cut straight to the chase: the decision was theirs and theirs only, and their choice was Lionel Messi.

The world didn't think Messi deserved the Golden Ball; he didn't seem too happy either.
The world didn't think Messi deserved the Golden Ball; he didn't seem too happy either.

It's dangerously fashionable to deride Messi due to the standards we've set for him: he was very good indeed for most of this World Cup but not quite its best player, and that means any supposed privileging of his cause will always be come down hard upon. But he had made little sustained impact after the group stages, and even if James Rodriguez's golden boot meant that the individual prizes needed to be shared around a little, surely people like Manuel Neuer or the second- and third-placed players, Thomas Muller and Arjen Robben, were more deserving bets.

The picking of Messi just seemed too "obvious," whether or not it was the sop to sponsors that has been claimed, and when even Sepp Blatter is politely disagreeing with it -- "Listen, I was myself a little bit surprised when I saw Messi coming up for the Golden Ball," he said afterward -- you have to think FIFA's judgment was flawed.

Verdict: Miss. Give it back to the press!