Previous
Liverpool
Real Madrid
0
3
FT
Game Details
Anderlecht
Arsenal
1
2
FT
Game Details
Atletico Madrid
Malmo FF
5
0
FT
Game Details
Olympiakos
Juventus
1
0
FT
Game Details
Ludogorets Razgrad
FC Basel
1
0
FT
Game Details
AS Monaco
Benfica
0
0
FT
Game Details
Bayer Leverkusen
Zenit St Petersburg
2
0
FT
Game Details
Galatasaray
Borussia Dortmund
0
4
FT
Game Details
Next

Duarte: Dunga's return is complicated

Brazil Jul 21, 2014
Read
Jun 22, 2014

FIFA must do better with concussions

Taylor Twellman and the panel talk about concussions in the world of sport and elaborate on why FIFA should not allow situations like Pereira's injury to be overlooked by referees.

I'm not a doctor. In fact, medical stuff tends to creep me out. Not the graphic side of it like rashes, fractures, blood or insides -- I can handle all that. What I've always found unsettling is the uncertainty of so much of what doctors do.

They observe ... and that observation may be incorrect. They judge, based on that observation, as well as their own experience and what they know from the textbooks ... and that, too, maybe incorrect.

And, finally, they diagnose ... but that too, may turn out incorrect because they're asked to play percentages and likelihoods.

Writing in The New Yorker years ago, Atul Gawande described with heart-wrenching accuracy how much of a trauma doctor's job was about figuring percentages and probabilities. I thought back to that as I watched Alvaro Pereira laid out cold on the pitch in Sao Paulo and the Uruguayan team doctor, Alberto Pan, hunched over him.

It's worth bearing this in mind when criticizing what happened in that Uruguay-England game Thursday. Forty-four seconds elapsed between the moment when Pan leaned over the prone Pereira and the instant when he appeared to signal to the bench for a substitution. That's when Pereira got annoyed and announced his intention to return to the game. Shortly thereafter, he was back on.

Pan submitted a statement after the match in which he confirmed for the record that he had completed a full neurological examination of Pereira and determined that the player was able to continue.

Pereira's sickening injury vs. England should have resulted in him leaving the game. FIFA deserve scrutiny.
Pereira's sickening injury vs. England should have resulted in him leaving the game. FIFA deserve scrutiny.

Here, you either put your trust in doctors or you don't. You either accept that Pan gave Pereira the same "full neurological examination" that he would give any other patient in any other circumstances, or you don't.

Many people are skeptical, starting with FIFPro, the players' union. It issued a statement calling on FIFA to review its own concussion protocols, and suggested reviewing the Laws of the Game so that a concussed player can be temporarily substituted while he is properly and thoroughly diagnosed.

ESPN's Taylor Twellman, whose own career was cut short by head injury, pointed out that the dangers of "second-impact" syndrome -- in short, suffering a blow to the head while concussed -- can be fatal.


“The Laws of the Game may be sacred to some, but they are not sacred enough that they should come before the safety of the players.”


Dr. Pan may well be satisfied with his neurological examination. And maybe he's right. To much of the world, however, it looked like something different. It looked as if a player overruled a medical professional. Pereira himself said he was "dizzy" and at "that moment [with] your adrenaline flowing in your body, maybe [I acted] without thinking."

Which is precisely why players are paid to play and doctors are paid to protect players from serious bodily injury.

- Report: FIFPro hits out at FIFA over Alvaro injury

There's an easy way around this, and it follows FIFPro's suggestion. FIFA has doctors and medical officers at every ground, and in fact, part of their job is to even determine when it gets so hot and humid that teams can have water breaks.

To avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, it seems only logical that these ought to be the folks who determine when a player in Pereira's condition gets the all-clear to return to the pitch, not the team doctor. And if it means allowing an extra, temporary substitution, so be it.

The Laws of the Game may be sacred to some, but they are not sacred enough that they should come before the safety of the players.

Pereira should not have been allowed to continue, prompting the need for a full review of concussion protocols.
Pereira should not have been allowed to continue, prompting the need for a full review of concussion protocols.

Pan was put in a horrible position on Thursday. If, in giving the all-clear, he was able to act entirely according to his conscience, to the hippocratic oath he took and to his years of experience as a medical professional, he is a strong, principled and courageous man.

But frankly, I doubt that every single team doctor is that strong and courageous. And it takes only one doctor to be swayed by team allegiance and the desire for victory for a player to be put in a life-threatening situation.

That's why it's time to have a clear protocol administered by independent medical professionals.

Gabriele Marcotti

A London-based journalist and broadcaster who covers world soccer, he is the author of three books, the world soccer columnist for The Times of London and a correspondent for the Italian daily Corriere dello Sport. You can catch him on ESPN FC TV and read him here twice a week.