Featured Matches
Previous
Manchester City
Liverpool
(1) 2
(3) 2
FT-Pens
Game Details
Vitesse Arnhem
Chelsea
1
3
FT
Game Details
AEL
Zenit St Petersburg
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk
FC Copenhagen
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Grasshoppers
Lille
0
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Feyenoord Rotterdam
Besiktas
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Legia Warsaw
Celtic
4
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Aktobe Lento
Steaua Bucuresti
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
FK Qarabag
SV Salzburg
2
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
AEL
Zenit St Petersburg
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Dnipro Dnipropetrovsk
FC Copenhagen
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
HJK Helsinki
Apoel Nicosia
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Grasshoppers
Lille
0
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Feyenoord Rotterdam
Besiktas
1
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Ludogorets Razgrad
Partizan Belgrade
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Standard Liege
Panathinaikos
0
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
AaB
Dinamo Zagreb
0
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
NK Maribor
Maccabi Tel-Aviv
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Legia Warsaw
Celtic
4
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Vitesse Arnhem
Chelsea
1
3
FT
Game Details
Chesterfield
Aston Villa
3
1
FT
Game Details
Hartlepool United
Middlesbrough
0
2
FT
Game Details
Walsall
Leicester City
2
3
FT
Game Details
York City
Nottingham Forest
1
2
FT
Game Details
Bury
Blackburn Rovers
1
1
FT
Game Details
Chester City
Tranmere Rovers
1
1
FT
Game Details
Peterborough United
Charlton Athletic
0
0
FT
Game Details
Plymouth Argyle
Yeovil Town
1
2
FT
Game Details
Port Vale
Bolton Wanderers
1
2
FT
Game Details
Sheffield Wednesday
Newcastle United
0
1
FT
Game Details
Southend United
Queens Park Rangers
0
0
FT
Game Details
St Neots Town
Luton XI
0
0
FT
Game Details
DC United
Toronto FC
3
0
FT
Game Details
New England
Colorado
3
0
LIVE 87'
Game Details
Chicago
Vancouver Whitecaps
0
0
LIVE 44'
Game Details
Real Salt Lake
New York Red Bulls
0
0
ESPN2 LIVE 11'
Game Details
Bolívar
San Lorenzo
0
0
LIVE HT
Leg 2. Aggregate: 0 - 5
Game Details
At. San Luis
Santos
2
1
LIVE 48'
Game Details
Mérida
Toluca
0
0
LIVE 53'
Game Details
Morelia
Necaxa
1
0
LIVE 63'
Game Details
Veracruz
Oaxaca
1
1
LIVE 55'
Game Details
Atlas
Dorados de Sinaloa
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Celaya
Puebla
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
UNAM
Atlante
2:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Novo Hamburgo
ABC
2
0
FT
Leg 2. Aggregate: 2 - 1
Game Details
CR Vasco da Gama
AA Ponte Preta
1
0
LIVE 23'
Leg 2. Aggregate: 3 - 0
Game Details
Bragantino
São Paulo
0
1
LIVE 18'
Leg 1
Game Details
Internacional
Ceará
0
0
LIVE 19'
Leg 1
Game Details
Manchester City
Liverpool
(1) 2
(3) 2
FT-Pens
Game Details
Los Caimanes
César Vallejo
1
0
FT
Game Details
UTC
Juan Aurich
3
1
FT
Game Details
Universitario de Deportes
Real Garcilaso
1:00 AM GMT
Game Details
U. Católica
Mushuc Runa
0
1
FT
Game Details
Emelec
Deportivo Quito
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Independiente del Valle
Club Deportivo Cuenca
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Olmedo
El Nacional
12:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Liga de Loja
LDU Quito
12:30 AM GMT
Game Details
Manta F.C.
Barcelona
12:30 AM GMT
Game Details
Antigua
Municipal
1
1
FT
Game Details
Washington Spirit
FC Kansas City
2
1
FT
Game Details
Houston Dash
Seattle Reign FC
1:00 AM GMT
Game Details
Next

Cox: Window pain

Tactics & Analysis Jul 17, 2014
Read

Tactics: U.S. defend deep

Tactics Board Jul 1, 2014
Read
 Posted by Michael Cox
Jun 29, 2014

Prolonged possession a must for U.S.

DaMarcus Beasley says the U.S. gave Germany too much respect and can't do the same against Belgium.

One of the most common Sunday League rallying cries makes absolutely no sense to a first-time viewer of football. "Still nil-nil, lads" is the call, made immediately after a goal has been scored.

The concept is relatively simple. At some point, "still nil-nil" became a shortened form of saying "Despite the fact we've just scored, we shouldn't let that affect our game plan. We should continue with our starting approach, which resulted in us going ahead in the first place."

That's something of a mouthful, however, and so it's "still nil-nil." But only when it's not. If the score is 0-0, no one needs reminding that it's still 0-0.

Among Jurgen Klinsmann's various methods of preparing his U.S. side -- the rigorous scouting of opponents, the high-quality physical preparation and the effective use of different formations -- maybe he's neglected a vital part. When the United States go ahead, there's no one screaming to the players that it's "still nil-nil."

Jurgen Klinsmann's preparation for this World Cup has been impressive.

The U.S. games against Ghana and Portugal were highly eventful, with the "game state" changing every time a goal was scored. In the 2-1 win over Ghana, the U.S. went ahead, then Ghana drew level, then the Yanks were ahead again. Including the starting 0-0 scoreline (which didn't last long), there were four different game states. Similarly, the draw against Portugal saw five different game states -- 0-0, 0-1, 1-1, 2-1, 2-2 -- although the last goal was scored so late that there was barely any play at 2-2.

When the game state changes, the approach of both sides inevitably changes too. The Americans' problem, however, is that they have been too easily affected by this, especially when they've gone ahead.

An easy, if basic, way to measure this is by considering the possession statistics during the various changes in game state. For example, when the U.S. were leading 1-0 against Ghana for 81 minutes, they had just 38 percent of the possession. When Ghana equalised, the U.S. suddenly sprung into life, and in the buildup to John Brooks' famous header, they had 59 percent of the ball. But once the goal was scored, it immediately dropped back down to 28 percent. When needed, they could dominate the game, but they were too submissive when ahead and invited lots of pressure.

There was a similar situation in the Portugal game. At 0-0, the U.S. started with a respectable 40 percent of possession but quickly went behind and were forced to dominate. At 1-0 down, they had exactly 50 percent of the ball, and when spurred on by Jermaine Jones' thunderbolt, the U.S. recorded 52 percent of possession in the buildup to Clint Dempsey's goal. But then, at 2-1 up, they had just 21 percent of possession.

- Tim Howard examines Belgian attack
- Carlisle: Belgium vs. U.S. -- Five questions
- Alvarez: Heat doesn't let up in knockout stage

The pattern is obvious. The U.S. have proved capable of competing against, and dominating, very good sides. But whenever they go ahead, they become too passive. If you can outplay Ghana and Portugal, it seems silly to retreat into your shell merely because you're leading.

It's inevitable that teams dominate more when they require a goal, but not to this extent. The U.S. are perfectly capable of retaining possession to put themselves ahead, but they have yet to prove they can retain possession to ensure they remain ahead.

The point isn't that the U.S. should always attempt to dominate possession. At this World Cup, there has been little correlation between possession and results, so sitting back and defending deep is a perfectly reasonable strategy.

The problem is that the Yanks aren't particularly suited to this style of play. They defend extremely narrow in midfield and force the opposition out wide but then appear nervous when defending crosses.

That was particularly obvious against Portugal -- see Geoff Cameron's mistake for Nani's opener and the fact Cristiano Ronaldo crossed for Silvestre Varela's late equaliser. Against Germany, too, there was a big problem when Jerome Boateng received the ball out wide, with Thomas Muller allowed a golden chance in this respect and Omar Gonzalez producing a Cameron-esque slice when trying to clear.

Geoff Cameron and the U.S. defense have struggled to defend threats from wide areas.

Nor, in fact, are the U.S. suited to counterattacking. The ball carriers like Graham Zusi and Alejandro Bedoya have performed competently, but no more. Michael Bradley, who has excelled at club level over the past three years with his ability to convert defence into attack smoothly, has covered a lot of ground but contributed little in possession. Up front, the absence of Jozy Altidore means the U.S. don't really have an out-ball -- no one to hold it up, no one to sprint in behind. They're just not suited to being a reactive side. They're more suited to playing high up the pitch, passing the ball well and getting the full-backs forward.

When the U.S. play football, they have been excellent. When they purely defend, they are never entirely confident. In the group phase, they allowed the opposition 55 shots -- along with Ecuador, more than any other side in the competition. It seems strange when you consider how much quality the U.S. have shown and their ability to (in spells) outplay Ghana and Portugal quite comfortably.

They're capable of outplaying Belgium too, and considering Belgium's tendency to start matches slowly and depend on late strikes from substitutes, it wouldn't be surprising if the U.S. went ahead in their round of 16 clash on Tuesday in Salvador. If that happens, the call from the bench should be simple: Still nil-nil, lads!

Michael Cox

Michael Cox is a freelance writer for ESPN.com. He is based in London and writes the Zonal Marking blog about football tactics. He also writes postmatch analysis for the Guardian and contributes regularly for FourFourTwo. You can follow him on Twitter @zonal_marking.

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.