Previous
Zenit St Petersburg
AS Monaco
0
0
FT
Game Details
Atletico Madrid
Juventus
1
0
FT
Game Details
Malmo FF
Olympiakos
2
0
FT
Game Details
FC Basel
Liverpool
1
0
FT
Game Details
Ludogorets Razgrad
Real Madrid
1
2
FT
Game Details
Bayer Leverkusen
Benfica
3
1
FT
Game Details
Anderlecht
Borussia Dortmund
0
3
FT
Game Details
Arsenal
Galatasaray
4
1
FT
Game Details
Leeds United
Reading
0
0
FT
Game Details
Wolverhampton Wanderers
Huddersfield Town
1
3
FT
Game Details
Fulham
Bolton Wanderers
4
0
FT
Game Details
Puebla
UNAM
1
2
FT
Game Details
America
Veracruz
2
0
FT
Game Details
Morelia
Pachuca
0
1
FT
Game Details
Chiapas
U. de G.
1
1
FT
Game Details
Tijuana
Cruz Azul
0
0
FT
Game Details
Ottawa Fury FC
Atlanta Silverbacks
2
0
FT
Game Details
Bahia
César Vallejo
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Atlético Nacional
EC Vitória
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Emelec
Goiás EC
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
San Lorenzo
Olimpo de Bahía Blanca
2
0
FT
Game Details
Estudiantes La Plata
Independiente
2
0
FT
Game Details
Crucero del Norte
Sp. Belgrano
1
0
FT
Game Details
All Boys
Sarmiento de Junín
1
0
FT
Game Details
Santa Marina
Atlético Tucumán
1
0
FT
Game Details
Unión de Santa Fe
Patronato
0
0
FT
Game Details
Boca Unidos
Colón de Santa Fe
0
0
FT
Game Details
Instituto de Córdoba
Guaraní A. Franco
1
1
FT
Game Details
Independiente Rivadavia
Huracán
1
1
FT
Game Details
Gimnasia y Esgrima de Jujuy
Aldosivi
1
1
FT
Game Details
Cruzeiro
ABC
1
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Botafogo
Santos FC
2
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Corinthians
Atlético MG
2
0
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
América RN
Flamengo
0
1
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Atlético Bucaramanga
Deportivo Pereira
1
1
FT
Game Details
Los Caimanes
Inti Gas Deportes
0
0
FT
Game Details
Unión Comercio
Universitario de Deportes
2
0
FT
Game Details
Sporting Cristal
Real Garcilaso
1
1
FT
Game Details
León de Huánuco
César Vallejo
Postp
Game Details
Guaraní
3 de Febrero
2
3
FT
Game Details
Deportivo Capiatá
Sportivo Luqueño
1
3
FT
Game Details
Libertad
Nacional
0
0
FT
Game Details
General Díaz
Olimpia
1
1
FT
Game Details
Mushuc Runa
U. Católica
2
0
FT
Game Details
Manta F.C.
Barcelona
2
4
FT
Game Details
Olmedo
Club Deportivo Cuenca
2
2
FT
Game Details
El Nacional
LDU Quito
0
0
FT
Game Details
Independiente del Valle
Deportivo Quito
2
0
FT
Game Details
Club Petrolero de Yacuiba
The Strongest
2
1
FT
Game Details
San José
Oriente Petrolero
3
0
FT
Game Details
Western Sydney Wanderers
FC Seoul
2
0
FT
Leg 2Aggregate: 2 - 0
Game Details
Saprissa
Alajuelense
0
2
FT
Game Details
CD Dragon
Alianza FC
0
0
FT
Game Details
Pasaquina FC
Juventud Independiente
1
1
FT
Game Details
Santa Tecla
Metapan
2
2
FT
Game Details
Atletico Marte
Aguila
0
0
FT
Game Details
CD FAS
Universidad de El Salvador
2
2
FT
Game Details
Valledupar F.C.
Atlético Junior
2
3
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Patriotas F.C.
Once Caldas
2
2
FT
Leg 1
Game Details
Next

Delaney: Arsenal's injury crisis

Arsenal 22 hours ago
Read
Apr 13, 2013

Hawk-Eye taking away the what-ifs

LONDON -- Rio Ferdinand, the veteran Manchester United defender, delivered this tweet after the Premier League announced Hawk-Eye would be used next season to show whether balls crossed the goal line.

"Goal line technology given green light, what will we do without all the media/pub/friends etc debates? will we miss it?"

Don't worry, Rio, with all the contentious penalty and offside decisions, questionable tackles -- and actual good football -- there will continue to be more than enough to talk about while sipping a few beers. Or, in your case, mineral water and Lucozade.

- England duo back goal-line technology

We might even discuss a player getting into a referee's face and sarcastically applauding after a game or someone who bypassed representing England because he didn’t want to mess up his fitness regime.

Who would do such a silly thing?

No, the Premier League's decision -- the world's most-watched soccer league will become the first in the soccer world to use goal-line technology -- was certainly the correct one. And it just had to be England, which has seen its fair share of goal-line controversies internationally: the 1966 World Cup final, 2010 World Cup and last year's Euros, to name a few.

That the Premier League chose British-based Hawk-Eye over GoalControl wasn't surprising, and it had nothing to do with GoalControl being a German firm. (In football, you see, Germany and England have long been rivals, although one team has been more dominant in their head-to-heads. You know which one.)

Despite GoalControl being picked by FIFA to be used at this summer's Confederations Cup and provisionally at next year's showpiece, the World Cup, both in Brazil, the Premier League had previously used Hawk-Eye in testing.

No system is 100 percent foolproof, but Hawk-Eye claims to be accurate to within a millimetre, which is much better than relying on a linesperson much farther away who, let's be honest, might be guessing half the time and might be swayed by the home fans.

In tennis, for instance, the introduction of Hawk-Eye on line calls has been mostly applauded by players -- although some still place more trust in a ball mark -- and the buildup to showing how far in or out the ball is on a big screen adds to the anticipation. Especially on close calls, the crowd habitually lets out a gasp when seeing the results.

It adds to the show.

Ferdinand makes it sound as if goal-line incidents happen every week, which, of course, isn't true. They're rare. Yet the consequences of making a wrong decision are high; therefore the decisions must be correct first and foremost.

Last week when Southampton visited struggling Reading, Hawk-Eye most certainly would have been called upon. With Southampton leading 2-0, Adam Le Fondre's close-range header was caught without much difficulty by Saints keeper Artur Boruc. Boruc, however, was off balance and moved backwards, behind the goal line. Reading furiously appealed, ultimately unsuccessfully, for a goal to be given. Television replays didn't show conclusively whether the entire ball had crossed the line.

But if it did? The deficit would have been halved, and with Southampton possessing a shaky defense and Reading not averse to comebacks, the Royals getting a leveler or even winning altogether wouldn’t have been overly surprising. Could Reading have then gone on a run and escaped the drop zone?

I'd go with Hawk-Eye rather than the linesperson, and so would Reading.

If Hawk-Eye had showed the ball didn't cross the line, the "what if" is taken out of the equation. Compared with tennis, stoppages will be far less frequent thanks to the dearth of debatable goal-line decisions. In the time a player gets off the ground after feigning injury, the Hawk-Eye ruling would be completed.

By getting such decisions correct, the watercooler chat wouldn't stop, either, Rio.

Let's go back to 2005 and Ferdinand's Old Trafford, when United hosted Tottenham. Somehow the lineperson missed Pedro Mendes' 50-yard effort for Tottenham crossing the line, even though it was over by about a yard.

Even when Hawk-Eye would have confirmed it was a goal, you don't think fans would have been muttering, "How did they miss that one?" The officials themselves back the use of technology to help in goal-line decisions because they know they can't get all the calls right.

It's just a shame technology won't be employed for those important offside judgments. They're more frequent.

It's also a shame that UEFA competitions won't be instituting goal-line technology anytime soon because UEFA boss Michel Platini isn't a fan. UEFA will continue to stick with its extra officials behind the goal, although they have proved to be completely unbeneficial.

Goal-line technology in the Premier League will prove to be beneficial, and even Ferdinand will be convinced, if he is not already.

I say "if he is not already" because, although it seems as if he's 50/50, he might think it's beneficial. I suppose we could also say "Goal-line technology in the Premier League will prove to be beneficial, and even Ferdinand will be entirely convinced."